https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279583 An express clause making the agreement subject to the jurisdiction of the courts at Kolkata was treated as an exclusive jurisdiction provision, because the contractual language and context showed an intention to confine disputes to that forum. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the application for appointment of an arbitrator. The objection concerning the validity of the arbitration agreement was not adjudicated and was left open for the competent court. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:31:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279583 An express clause making the agreement subject to the jurisdiction of the courts at Kolkata was treated as an exclusive jurisdiction provision, because the contractual language and context showed an intention to confine disputes to that forum. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the application for appointment of an arbitrator. The objection concerning the validity of the arbitration agreement was not adjudicated and was left open for the competent court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279583