https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279584 Where more than one court otherwise has jurisdiction, parties may lawfully agree to submit disputes to one competent forum to the exclusion of others, and such a clause does not offend public policy or Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. On that principle, a suit filed at Bhubaneswar contrary to a contractual stipulation conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Courts at Calcutta was not maintainable there, and the objection to territorial jurisdiction succeeded. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:31:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279584 Where more than one court otherwise has jurisdiction, parties may lawfully agree to submit disputes to one competent forum to the exclusion of others, and such a clause does not offend public policy or Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. On that principle, a suit filed at Bhubaneswar contrary to a contractual stipulation conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Courts at Calcutta was not maintainable there, and the objection to territorial jurisdiction succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279584