<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>S.68 NRA iron and Steel P. Ltd. (SC) - A fit case for recall and reconsideration by the Supreme Court to avoid miscarriage of justice and in justice in future.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8431</link>
    <description>The article contends the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on unexplained share capital in the NRA Iron matter should be recalled and reconsidered because counsel failures and non-presentation of relevant precedents produced a judgment that overlooked key evidentiary and statutory considerations. It emphasizes that a payee who presents and obtains payment on a cheque paid by the drawee bank should not be required to explain the source of the payor&#039;s funds, that share certificates and public registration evidence recognition of liability, and that share premium and investors&#039; capital/reserves legitimately explain large subscriptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:50:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>S.68 NRA iron and Steel P. Ltd. (SC) - A fit case for recall and reconsideration by the Supreme Court to avoid miscarriage of justice and in justice in future.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8431</link>
      <description>The article contends the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on unexplained share capital in the NRA Iron matter should be recalled and reconsidered because counsel failures and non-presentation of relevant precedents produced a judgment that overlooked key evidentiary and statutory considerations. It emphasizes that a payee who presents and obtains payment on a cheque paid by the drawee bank should not be required to explain the source of the payor&#039;s funds, that share certificates and public registration evidence recognition of liability, and that share premium and investors&#039; capital/reserves legitimately explain large subscriptions.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:50:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>