<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1269 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377248</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the sale proclamation due to the petitioner&#039;s full tax payment and highlighted the need for the waiver application under Section 220(2A) to be considered before proceeding with the sale. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to decide on the waiver application within six months. The Court also ordered the petitioner to reimburse the respondent for sale proclamation expenses, emphasizing the importance of fairness in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1269 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377248</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the sale proclamation due to the petitioner&#039;s full tax payment and highlighted the need for the waiver application under Section 220(2A) to be considered before proceeding with the sale. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to decide on the waiver application within six months. The Court also ordered the petitioner to reimburse the respondent for sale proclamation expenses, emphasizing the importance of fairness in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>