<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377246</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The Court emphasized that the statements alone cannot lead to a sustainable addition in declared income without corroborative evidence. The Court criticized the practice of imposing tax on alleged undisclosed income without proper investigation and action against institutions involved in extortionate practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377246</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The Court emphasized that the statements alone cannot lead to a sustainable addition in declared income without corroborative evidence. The Court criticized the practice of imposing tax on alleged undisclosed income without proper investigation and action against institutions involved in extortionate practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>