<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377222</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concurring with the CIT(A) that the transactions between the assessee and M/s Arbes Tools Pvt Ltd were normal business dealings and not loans or advances. Therefore, the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act did not apply, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377222</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concurring with the CIT(A) that the transactions between the assessee and M/s Arbes Tools Pvt Ltd were normal business dealings and not loans or advances. Therefore, the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act did not apply, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>