https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377207 Extended period of limitation was considered inapplicable where a State Government corporation had no contumacious conduct or suppression of facts in relation to disputed service tax on renting of immovable property; on that reasoning, the demand was treated as time-barred. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view and Circular No. 89/7/2006-ST to note that mere non-payment during a period of taxability dispute does not justify alleging mala fide against a statutory body. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377207 Extended period of limitation was considered inapplicable where a State Government corporation had no contumacious conduct or suppression of facts in relation to disputed service tax on renting of immovable property; on that reasoning, the demand was treated as time-barred. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view and Circular No. 89/7/2006-ST to note that mere non-payment during a period of taxability dispute does not justify alleging mala fide against a statutory body. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377207