<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17413</link>
    <description>Section 179 of the Income-tax Act creates joint and several liability for directors of a private company for the company&#039;s tax dues, even where the company is not in liquidation, subject to the director proving absence of gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The impugned communications were held to be recovery notices calling for payment of outstanding dues, not assessment orders. On the facts, recovery need not first be exhausted against the company because its assets had already been disposed of and possession transferred to a purchaser. The challenge to recovery against the director therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17413</link>
      <description>Section 179 of the Income-tax Act creates joint and several liability for directors of a private company for the company&#039;s tax dues, even where the company is not in liquidation, subject to the director proving absence of gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The impugned communications were held to be recovery notices calling for payment of outstanding dues, not assessment orders. On the facts, recovery need not first be exhausted against the company because its assets had already been disposed of and possession transferred to a purchaser. The challenge to recovery against the director therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>