<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1222 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377201</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) followed an earlier Tribunal ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case, which had already been upheld by the High Court, and found no contrary basis to depart from that settled position. As the Revenue advanced no argument undermining the applicability of that prior decision, the challenged order was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1222 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377201</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) followed an earlier Tribunal ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case, which had already been upheld by the High Court, and found no contrary basis to depart from that settled position. As the Revenue advanced no argument undermining the applicability of that prior decision, the challenged order was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>