<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1439 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a motorcycle manufacturer, in a case concerning service tax on expenses for expatriate employees. It was determined that an employer-employee relationship existed between the appellant and the expatriates, and no service tax was payable on the expenses. The demand raised by the department was found to be incorrectly computed, leading to the impugned order being set aside. Penalties imposed on the appellant were also overturned as the service tax demand was deemed unjustified. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1439 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a motorcycle manufacturer, in a case concerning service tax on expenses for expatriate employees. It was determined that an employer-employee relationship existed between the appellant and the expatriates, and no service tax was payable on the expenses. The demand raised by the department was found to be incorrectly computed, leading to the impugned order being set aside. Penalties imposed on the appellant were also overturned as the service tax demand was deemed unjustified. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>