<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1668 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the transfer of 30% undivided share of land to the developer for construction purposes was considered an investment by the assessee, allowing for exemption under Section 54 for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of the joint development agreement and the timing of the transfer of property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1668 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for exemption under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the transfer of 30% undivided share of land to the developer for construction purposes was considered an investment by the assessee, allowing for exemption under Section 54 for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of the joint development agreement and the timing of the transfer of property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>