<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1413 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279568</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with various issues remitted back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal stressed the importance of the assessee providing sufficient evidence to support its claims and instructed a reevaluation based on the submitted documentation. The decision underscored the significance of thorough and precise documentation in transfer pricing cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1413 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279568</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with various issues remitted back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal stressed the importance of the assessee providing sufficient evidence to support its claims and instructed a reevaluation based on the submitted documentation. The decision underscored the significance of thorough and precise documentation in transfer pricing cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>