<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1303 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279578</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the State&#039;s challenge, setting aside awards for reduced productivity, subsequent legislation, and royalty charges, while upholding the rest of the award. Challenges by Atlanta and the State regarding other claims were dismissed, confirming the tribunal&#039;s awards on various heads of compensation, interest, and costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1303 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279578</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the State&#039;s challenge, setting aside awards for reduced productivity, subsequent legislation, and royalty charges, while upholding the rest of the award. Challenges by Atlanta and the State regarding other claims were dismissed, confirming the tribunal&#039;s awards on various heads of compensation, interest, and costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>