https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279556 Ice cream with 5.95% milk fat fell below the 10% standard fixed in Appendix B of the Food Adulteration Rules and was therefore adulterated under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The fact that buffalo milk naturally contains a lower fat content did not excuse non-compliance, because the prescribed standard could be achieved by ordinary preparation methods. The conviction of the firm's liable respondents was thus sustained. By contrast, partners could be held liable only on proof that they were in charge of, or responsible for, the conduct of the business, and no such material existed against the other partners; their acquittal was confirmed. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:37:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279556 Ice cream with 5.95% milk fat fell below the 10% standard fixed in Appendix B of the Food Adulteration Rules and was therefore adulterated under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The fact that buffalo milk naturally contains a lower fat content did not excuse non-compliance, because the prescribed standard could be achieved by ordinary preparation methods. The conviction of the firm's liable respondents was thus sustained. By contrast, partners could be held liable only on proof that they were in charge of, or responsible for, the conduct of the business, and no such material existed against the other partners; their acquittal was confirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279556