<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17404</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the conveyance allowance of Rs. 100 per month paid to employees by the petitioners&#039; association is not exempt from tax under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the allowance was not solely for expenses incurred in the performance of duties but rather a general payment made regardless of actual conveyance expenditure. Consequently, the writ petition was rejected, the rule discharged, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17404</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the conveyance allowance of Rs. 100 per month paid to employees by the petitioners&#039; association is not exempt from tax under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the allowance was not solely for expenses incurred in the performance of duties but rather a general payment made regardless of actual conveyance expenditure. Consequently, the writ petition was rejected, the rule discharged, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>