https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279553 The Court restored the case to its original file and number with parties' consent. The petitioner, who had agreed to pay compensation in phases, requested a reduction in the amount, but the Court denied the request due to the petitioner's prior commitment. The Court allowed the petitioner to pay in instalments, specifying a payment schedule. Failure to adhere to the schedule would result in imprisonment, but compliance would lead to modification of the sentence. The Court directed the petitioner to make timely payments to avoid dismissal of the revisional application. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:20:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279553 The Court restored the case to its original file and number with parties' consent. The petitioner, who had agreed to pay compensation in phases, requested a reduction in the amount, but the Court denied the request due to the petitioner's prior commitment. The Court allowed the petitioner to pay in instalments, specifying a payment schedule. Failure to adhere to the schedule would result in imprisonment, but compliance would lead to modification of the sentence. The Court directed the petitioner to make timely payments to avoid dismissal of the revisional application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279553