<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1200 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377179</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under Section 14A and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the classification of income as &quot;Income from Business or Profession&quot; versus &quot;Capital Gains&quot;. The tribunal&#039;s decision, pronounced in March 2019, emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions when facts remain unchanged, following precedents set in previous assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1200 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377179</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under Section 14A and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the classification of income as &quot;Income from Business or Profession&quot; versus &quot;Capital Gains&quot;. The tribunal&#039;s decision, pronounced in March 2019, emphasized the importance of consistency in judicial decisions when facts remain unchanged, following precedents set in previous assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>