<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1180 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism but recognized the revenue-neutral nature of the situation. Setting aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal upheld the demand, interest, and other penalties imposed. The appeal was partially allowed on these terms, and the Department&#039;s Miscellaneous Application for a change of cause title was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1180 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism but recognized the revenue-neutral nature of the situation. Setting aside the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal upheld the demand, interest, and other penalties imposed. The appeal was partially allowed on these terms, and the Department&#039;s Miscellaneous Application for a change of cause title was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>