<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1171 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377150</link>
    <description>The SC considered a revenue authority&#039;s SLP challenging the impugned order in an income-tax matter. Exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Art. 136, the SC found no ground warranting interference with the challenged decision and consequently refused special leave, resulting in dismissal of the SLP. All pending applications were disposed of as a corollary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1171 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377150</link>
      <description>The SC considered a revenue authority&#039;s SLP challenging the impugned order in an income-tax matter. Exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Art. 136, the SC found no ground warranting interference with the challenged decision and consequently refused special leave, resulting in dismissal of the SLP. All pending applications were disposed of as a corollary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>