<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1161 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the additions forming the basis of the penalty were nullified due to the unlawful reopening of the assessment, the penalty itself was unsustainable. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the Tribunal overturned the orders of the Revenue authorities, annulling the penalty of Rs. 2,82,4323 imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1161 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the additions forming the basis of the penalty were nullified due to the unlawful reopening of the assessment, the penalty itself was unsustainable. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the Tribunal overturned the orders of the Revenue authorities, annulling the penalty of Rs. 2,82,4323 imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>