<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1159 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the quantum addition confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) due to the assessee&#039;s reasonable opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was also set aside as it was based on the additions in the assessment order that did not survive. Both appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1159 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the quantum addition confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) due to the assessee&#039;s reasonable opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was also set aside as it was based on the additions in the assessment order that did not survive. Both appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>