https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279543 Territorial jurisdiction for a Section 138 NI Act complaint may lie where one of the constituent acts of the offence occurs, because the offence is complete only when the cheque is drawn, presented, dishonoured, notice is issued, and payment is not made in sequence. Applying the principle reflected in Section 178(d) CrPC, the Court held that Sopore had jurisdiction since the cheque was presented at UCO Bank, Sopore, and presentation formed a material part of the offence. The later decision on notice issued from a different place was distinguished as inapplicable on these facts. en-us Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:55:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279543 Territorial jurisdiction for a Section 138 NI Act complaint may lie where one of the constituent acts of the offence occurs, because the offence is complete only when the cheque is drawn, presented, dishonoured, notice is issued, and payment is not made in sequence. Applying the principle reflected in Section 178(d) CrPC, the Court held that Sopore had jurisdiction since the cheque was presented at UCO Bank, Sopore, and presentation formed a material part of the offence. The later decision on notice issued from a different place was distinguished as inapplicable on these facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279543