https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279538 Preventive detention was upheld where the delay in passing and executing the detention order was explained by collection of voluminous bank documents, later statements of bank officials, and the time needed to translate and serve the material; the court found no unreasonable or unexplained delay that would break the live and proximate link between the grounds and the object of detention. The detention order was also not invalidated by a counter-affidavit reference to a four-year period of FERA-related activity, because the explanation showed it did not conflict with the detention grounds or undermine the basis of the order. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:13:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279538 Preventive detention was upheld where the delay in passing and executing the detention order was explained by collection of voluminous bank documents, later statements of bank officials, and the time needed to translate and serve the material; the court found no unreasonable or unexplained delay that would break the live and proximate link between the grounds and the object of detention. The detention order was also not invalidated by a counter-affidavit reference to a four-year period of FERA-related activity, because the explanation showed it did not conflict with the detention grounds or undermine the basis of the order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279538