<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1153 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377132</link>
    <description>The court clarified the interpretation of the law regarding deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the exclusion of certain expenses, treatment of foreign currency expenses, and the set off of brought forward losses. The decision provided clarity on these aspects, highlighting the importance of precise application of legal provisions for accurate deduction computation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to the lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1153 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377132</link>
      <description>The court clarified the interpretation of the law regarding deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the exclusion of certain expenses, treatment of foreign currency expenses, and the set off of brought forward losses. The decision provided clarity on these aspects, highlighting the importance of precise application of legal provisions for accurate deduction computation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to the lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>