<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1152 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal due to staff negligence. It canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the assessee provided genuine explanations for discrepancies in income and disallowance under section 80P(2). The Tribunal emphasized the significance of bona fide beliefs and complete disclosure of facts in determining penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1152 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal due to staff negligence. It canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the assessee provided genuine explanations for discrepancies in income and disallowance under section 80P(2). The Tribunal emphasized the significance of bona fide beliefs and complete disclosure of facts in determining penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>