<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1137 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377116</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court clarified its territorial jurisdiction in entertaining Revenue appeals and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a sum of Rs. 4.07 Crores was not deemed dividend but a repayment of a loan by the Assessee to the Company. The Court emphasized that the issue was factual, with no legal question. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, including a related one involving Rs. 21.20 Crores, as they were factually similar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1137 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377116</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court clarified its territorial jurisdiction in entertaining Revenue appeals and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a sum of Rs. 4.07 Crores was not deemed dividend but a repayment of a loan by the Assessee to the Company. The Court emphasized that the issue was factual, with no legal question. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, including a related one involving Rs. 21.20 Crores, as they were factually similar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>