<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1128 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification regarding the addition made on account of suppressed receipt. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of expenditure on payment of supervision charges, noting inconsistency with previous and subsequent years. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of an amount due to nonfurnishing of TDS details, finding the AO&#039;s view erroneous and allowing the appeal in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1128 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification regarding the addition made on account of suppressed receipt. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of expenditure on payment of supervision charges, noting inconsistency with previous and subsequent years. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of an amount due to nonfurnishing of TDS details, finding the AO&#039;s view erroneous and allowing the appeal in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>