<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1154 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279519</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PUNE upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing a deduction u/s 80IB(10) for the assessee based on the plot area meeting the minimum requirement. The Tribunal referenced a previous case and a CBDT circular to support its decision. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they failed to provide contrary evidence and the Tribunal found the facts analogous to the previous case. Therefore, the deduction was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1154 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279519</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT PUNE upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing a deduction u/s 80IB(10) for the assessee based on the plot area meeting the minimum requirement. The Tribunal referenced a previous case and a CBDT circular to support its decision. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they failed to provide contrary evidence and the Tribunal found the facts analogous to the previous case. Therefore, the deduction was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>