https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17381 The court quashed the previous orders and remitted the case to the Board for reconsideration. The Board was instructed to issue new orders after allowing the petitioner to present their case regarding Sections 80-O and 80HHB. The court stressed the importance of the Board providing detailed justifications for its decisions and adhering to its internal guidelines. The writ petitions were granted, and the respondents were directed to review the petitioner's application for approval of the agreement dated March 26, 1981. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17381 The court quashed the previous orders and remitted the case to the Board for reconsideration. The Board was instructed to issue new orders after allowing the petitioner to present their case regarding Sections 80-O and 80HHB. The court stressed the importance of the Board providing detailed justifications for its decisions and adhering to its internal guidelines. The writ petitions were granted, and the respondents were directed to review the petitioner's application for approval of the agreement dated March 26, 1981. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17381