<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1126 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377105</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment notice issued beyond the permissible period was invalid as no new material facts were presented. The grounds for reopening the assessment had already been examined during the original assessment. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, allowing and disposing of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1126 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377105</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment notice issued beyond the permissible period was invalid as no new material facts were presented. The grounds for reopening the assessment had already been examined during the original assessment. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, allowing and disposing of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>