<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1096 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377075</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the obligation to pay interest under Section 11BB for delayed refunds of unutilized CENVAT credit, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that it only applies to excess duty paid or collected. The Court emphasized the statutory requirement to pay interest even for unutilized credit refunds, in line with precedents and statutory provisions. The appeals were dismissed, with no substantial questions for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1096 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377075</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the obligation to pay interest under Section 11BB for delayed refunds of unutilized CENVAT credit, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that it only applies to excess duty paid or collected. The Court emphasized the statutory requirement to pay interest even for unutilized credit refunds, in line with precedents and statutory provisions. The appeals were dismissed, with no substantial questions for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>