<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1095 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and directed the original authority to reevaluate the valuation of &#039;physician samples&#039; for duty liability, emphasizing procedural compliance and thorough examination of facts to ensure accurate application of tax laws. The case highlighted the importance of adhering to procedural rules and rectifying incorrect decisions based on incomplete facts through a comprehensive review by the lower authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:01:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1095 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and directed the original authority to reevaluate the valuation of &#039;physician samples&#039; for duty liability, emphasizing procedural compliance and thorough examination of facts to ensure accurate application of tax laws. The case highlighted the importance of adhering to procedural rules and rectifying incorrect decisions based on incomplete facts through a comprehensive review by the lower authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>