<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Original Authority properly sanctioned the refund claim in compliance with remand directions, examining price reduction and unjust enrichment. The Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded the scope of remand by disallowing the refund based on Rule 7 compliance, which was not within the remand&#039;s purview. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with appropriate reliefs granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Original Authority properly sanctioned the refund claim in compliance with remand directions, examining price reduction and unjust enrichment. The Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded the scope of remand by disallowing the refund based on Rule 7 compliance, which was not within the remand&#039;s purview. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with appropriate reliefs granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>