<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SECTION 12A OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 IS NOT VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8424</link>
    <description>Section 12A permits withdrawal of an admitted corporate insolvency application only with substantial Committee of Creditors approval and procedural safeguards; regulations prescribe the filing route, timing, a bank guarantee for estimated costs, prompt committee consideration and forwarding by the resolution professional to the adjudicating authority. Judicial review upheld the design as consistent with the collective, in rem nature of insolvency proceedings, preserved adjudicatory oversight before committee constitution, and found the creditor-approval threshold to be a legislative policy choice not offending equality guarantees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:00:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SECTION 12A OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 IS NOT VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8424</link>
      <description>Section 12A permits withdrawal of an admitted corporate insolvency application only with substantial Committee of Creditors approval and procedural safeguards; regulations prescribe the filing route, timing, a bank guarantee for estimated costs, prompt committee consideration and forwarding by the resolution professional to the adjudicating authority. Judicial review upheld the design as consistent with the collective, in rem nature of insolvency proceedings, preserved adjudicatory oversight before committee constitution, and found the creditor-approval threshold to be a legislative policy choice not offending equality guarantees.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:00:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>