<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279501</link>
    <description>A month under the Bombay General Clauses Act is computed according to the British calendar, meaning it runs from a given date in one month to the corresponding date in the next month, not as a fixed 30-day period. Applied to Sections 12(2) and 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act, the phrases &quot;expiration of one month next after notice&quot; and &quot;expiration of period of one month after notice&quot; were construed to mean the corresponding day of the following month after excluding the day of service. The word &quot;next&quot; did not permit payment until the end of the calendar month. Payment after that corresponding date did not protect the tenant from eviction under Section 12(3)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:24:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279501</link>
      <description>A month under the Bombay General Clauses Act is computed according to the British calendar, meaning it runs from a given date in one month to the corresponding date in the next month, not as a fixed 30-day period. Applied to Sections 12(2) and 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act, the phrases &quot;expiration of one month next after notice&quot; and &quot;expiration of period of one month after notice&quot; were construed to mean the corresponding day of the following month after excluding the day of service. The word &quot;next&quot; did not permit payment until the end of the calendar month. Payment after that corresponding date did not protect the tenant from eviction under Section 12(3)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>