<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1078 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377057</link>
    <description>The AAR permitted withdrawal of the advance ruling application after the applicant stated that an amendment to the tax-rate notification had altered the applicable GST position on royalty-related services. As a result, the Authority did not adjudicate the classification of services or the GST rate issue on merits and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No substantive ruling was recorded on the tax treatment sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1078 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377057</link>
      <description>The AAR permitted withdrawal of the advance ruling application after the applicant stated that an amendment to the tax-rate notification had altered the applicable GST position on royalty-related services. As a result, the Authority did not adjudicate the classification of services or the GST rate issue on merits and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No substantive ruling was recorded on the tax treatment sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>