https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377051 A writ of habeas corpus is not maintainable where the detenue remains in custody under a subsisting judicial remand order passed by a competent court; the legality of that custody cannot be questioned in a writ petition unless the remand order itself is first challenged and set aside. The challenge based on non-compliance with Section 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 also failed because the record showed that the authorisation had been issued by the competent authority, removing the basis for alleging unlawful detention. The petition was therefore dismissed. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377051 A writ of habeas corpus is not maintainable where the detenue remains in custody under a subsisting judicial remand order passed by a competent court; the legality of that custody cannot be questioned in a writ petition unless the remand order itself is first challenged and set aside. The challenge based on non-compliance with Section 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 also failed because the record showed that the authorisation had been issued by the competent authority, removing the basis for alleging unlawful detention. The petition was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377051