<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1058 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377037</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the allocation of unutilised Raw Pet Coke (RPC) quota by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and directed a re-computation based on the shortfall between the quantity applied for and allocated. The Court found the allocation method based on production capacity irrational and emphasized reallocating the surrendered quantity based on actual requirements. The decision aimed to ensure fair distribution among manufacturers and highlighted the importance of a rational apportionment method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1058 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377037</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the allocation of unutilised Raw Pet Coke (RPC) quota by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and directed a re-computation based on the shortfall between the quantity applied for and allocated. The Court found the allocation method based on production capacity irrational and emphasized reallocating the surrendered quantity based on actual requirements. The decision aimed to ensure fair distribution among manufacturers and highlighted the importance of a rational apportionment method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>