https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377033 The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act due to reasonable cause for non-payment of tax liability. The demand of service tax liability on differential amounts was modified, with certain expenses excluded but others upheld from a specific date, necessitating quantification. The case emphasizes the significance of legal interpretations and reliance on official circulars in tax disputes, showcasing the tribunal's authority to set aside penalties under specific provisions of the Finance Act. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:45:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377033 The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act due to reasonable cause for non-payment of tax liability. The demand of service tax liability on differential amounts was modified, with certain expenses excluded but others upheld from a specific date, necessitating quantification. The case emphasizes the significance of legal interpretations and reliance on official circulars in tax disputes, showcasing the tribunal's authority to set aside penalties under specific provisions of the Finance Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377033