<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1049 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377028</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties under Section 78 while upholding the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty under section 77. The tribunal invoked Section 80 to waive the penalties under Section 78 based on the distributors&#039; genuine belief that service tax did not apply to prepaid sim card distribution. The appellant&#039;s prior payment of a significant portion of the tax before the show-cause notice was a key factor in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:45:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1049 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377028</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties under Section 78 while upholding the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty under section 77. The tribunal invoked Section 80 to waive the penalties under Section 78 based on the distributors&#039; genuine belief that service tax did not apply to prepaid sim card distribution. The appellant&#039;s prior payment of a significant portion of the tax before the show-cause notice was a key factor in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>