https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377024 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence to prove evasion or removal of goods without duty payment. The decision highlighted the importance of verifying facts and providing admissible evidence in cases of alleged duty evasion and clandestine removal of goods. The judgment underscored the need for substantiated claims and adherence to legal procedures in cases involving Central Excise duty, emphasizing the requirement for concrete evidence to support actions like confiscation and penalties. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377024 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence to prove evasion or removal of goods without duty payment. The decision highlighted the importance of verifying facts and providing admissible evidence in cases of alleged duty evasion and clandestine removal of goods. The judgment underscored the need for substantiated claims and adherence to legal procedures in cases involving Central Excise duty, emphasizing the requirement for concrete evidence to support actions like confiscation and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377024