https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376997 The High Court set aside the judgment that had dismissed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act due to a delay in filing after the first notice of default. Relying on a Supreme Court ruling, the High Court held that a complaint based on a second or successive default is permissible, even if no action was taken on the first default, as long as requirements under the law are met. The matter was remitted back to the Appellate Court for reconsideration on merits, emphasizing that no judgment was made on the parties' claims or defenses. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376997 The High Court set aside the judgment that had dismissed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act due to a delay in filing after the first notice of default. Relying on a Supreme Court ruling, the High Court held that a complaint based on a second or successive default is permissible, even if no action was taken on the first default, as long as requirements under the law are met. The matter was remitted back to the Appellate Court for reconsideration on merits, emphasizing that no judgment was made on the parties' claims or defenses. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376997