<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1540 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279496</link>
    <description>A recovery made as compensation for failure to meet the contracted less displacement tonnage requirement was not consideration for any service, so no service tax was payable on that amount. Service tax under the head of port service could not be demanded for the period prior to 01.07.2003 because the levy then applied only to services in major ports, while the relevant facilities were minor ports outside the taxable net. The demand was therefore unsustainable on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1540 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279496</link>
      <description>A recovery made as compensation for failure to meet the contracted less displacement tonnage requirement was not consideration for any service, so no service tax was payable on that amount. Service tax under the head of port service could not be demanded for the period prior to 01.07.2003 because the levy then applied only to services in major ports, while the relevant facilities were minor ports outside the taxable net. The demand was therefore unsustainable on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>