https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279487 Article 22(1) requires an arrested person to be told the real and intelligible grounds of arrest, not merely the statutory provisions invoked; citation of sections alone was held inadequate because it did not disclose the factual basis needed to understand and challenge the arrest, so the arrest was illegal. Continued custody also had to rest on a valid remand order; a mere direction to list the matter later did not amount to remand under the criminal procedure law, so the detention after production before the Magistrate was unlawful. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279487 Article 22(1) requires an arrested person to be told the real and intelligible grounds of arrest, not merely the statutory provisions invoked; citation of sections alone was held inadequate because it did not disclose the factual basis needed to understand and challenge the arrest, so the arrest was illegal. Continued custody also had to rest on a valid remand order; a mere direction to list the matter later did not amount to remand under the criminal procedure law, so the detention after production before the Magistrate was unlawful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Feb 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279487