<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1311 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow foreign tax payments as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of expenses on maintenance of ships was dismissed due to lack of COD approval. The Tribunal emphasized the need for COD approval before pursuing certain issues, leading to the dismissal of this ground of appeal. The judgment was delivered on 23rd December 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:49:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1311 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow foreign tax payments as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of expenses on maintenance of ships was dismissed due to lack of COD approval. The Tribunal emphasized the need for COD approval before pursuing certain issues, leading to the dismissal of this ground of appeal. The judgment was delivered on 23rd December 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>