<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 827 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279481</link>
    <description>A seized vehicle that had not been confiscated was held outside the scope of the Delhi Excise Act&#039;s confiscation bar, so Section 58 did not prevent interim release. The Court noted that release was governed by Chapter VI of the Act read with Section 451 CrPC, and since the vehicle was no longer required by police, there was no legal impediment to returning it on superdari to the registered owner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 827 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279481</link>
      <description>A seized vehicle that had not been confiscated was held outside the scope of the Delhi Excise Act&#039;s confiscation bar, so Section 58 did not prevent interim release. The Court noted that release was governed by Chapter VI of the Act read with Section 451 CrPC, and since the vehicle was no longer required by police, there was no legal impediment to returning it on superdari to the registered owner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>