<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1002 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 2% of exempt income under Section 14A, disallowed expenses related to bonus shares as capital in nature, allowed the deduction of ex-gratia payment, pooja expenses, speculative loss on derivative transactions, entertainment expenses, bad debts written off, broken period interest, brokerage paid, and interest on non-performing assets. The Tribunal directed verification of the correct amount of loss on the sale of HTM securities and disallowed the provision for leave encashment and medical leave. The Tribunal also deleted the addition on account of unclaimed balance and held that Section 115J is not applicable to banking companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1002 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 2% of exempt income under Section 14A, disallowed expenses related to bonus shares as capital in nature, allowed the deduction of ex-gratia payment, pooja expenses, speculative loss on derivative transactions, entertainment expenses, bad debts written off, broken period interest, brokerage paid, and interest on non-performing assets. The Tribunal directed verification of the correct amount of loss on the sale of HTM securities and disallowed the provision for leave encashment and medical leave. The Tribunal also deleted the addition on account of unclaimed balance and held that Section 115J is not applicable to banking companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>