<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1596 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty notices and the necessity for the Assessing Officer to apply his mind when initiating penalty proceedings. The Tribunal highlighted adherence to the principles of natural justice and the requirement for precise communication of charges to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:44:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1596 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty notices and the necessity for the Assessing Officer to apply his mind when initiating penalty proceedings. The Tribunal highlighted adherence to the principles of natural justice and the requirement for precise communication of charges to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>