<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 29 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17347</link>
    <description>The HC held the Tribunal erred: deduction under section 80-I must be computed on gross total income, not on income reduced by a section 80HH deduction. Parliament&#039;s amendments show no provision requiring subtraction of section 80HH relief before applying section 80-I, so the benefit of section 80-I accrues on gross total income. The question was answered in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 21:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 29 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17347</link>
      <description>The HC held the Tribunal erred: deduction under section 80-I must be computed on gross total income, not on income reduced by a section 80HH deduction. Parliament&#039;s amendments show no provision requiring subtraction of section 80HH relief before applying section 80-I, so the benefit of section 80-I accrues on gross total income. The question was answered in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>