<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376968</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive once the underlying additions for professional fees and brand ambassador income are deleted, because the basis for alleging concealment ceases. Penalty is also not leviable on deemed rental income from a Dubai villa where taxability depends on the interaction between the DTAA and domestic law and remains a debatable legal issue. The revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed, and deletion of the penalties was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376968</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive once the underlying additions for professional fees and brand ambassador income are deleted, because the basis for alleging concealment ceases. Penalty is also not leviable on deemed rental income from a Dubai villa where taxability depends on the interaction between the DTAA and domestic law and remains a debatable legal issue. The revenue&#039;s appeal therefore failed, and deletion of the penalties was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>